Surprisingly Good
If it were possible to apologize to books, my apologies would be to the first two books in this trilogy. I thought the first book was ok. There wasn't anything about it that made me love this book, although to be honest, Sand dan Glokta is a fantastic character. In fact, it was Glokta who kept me in the loop in the second book, which I liked less than the first. He has been the glue to keep me tied to the story and entice me to complete it. Now, I see what was happening. Not only are these books one long story, but books one and two were setup books for this one, which delivered many times over. I was tuned in from page one. This book had quite a few twists; none of them felt forced. There was tension and anticipation masterfully woven this time, as Abercrombie brought the fight to us that he'd held in front of us like dangling carrots previously. While I still feel like Bayaz's tale in book 2 was an overlong red herring, Bayaz delivered the beats for the rhythm of this book. Also, I previously stated that this trilogy did not feel grimdark, as many others have described it. This is the book that made me see it. Lastly, while the First Law trilogy won't make it into my top 10 series of all time, Last Argument of Kings has at least made into my top 10 books for the year, and it has a strong chance to still be there at year's end.

